Comments on: Memory consumption http://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/ news for few, stuff no-one cares about Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: behdad http://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-20269 behdad Sun, 03 Sep 2006 20:11:37 +0000 http://www.colino.net/wordpress-1.5/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/#comment-20269 Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately I get this from my distro's (FC5) versionof Sylpheed-Claws: Sylpheed-Claws has been compiled with an older GTK+ library than is currently available. This will cause crashes. You need to recompile Sylpheed-Claws. Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately I get this from my distro’s (FC5) versionof Sylpheed-Claws:

Sylpheed-Claws has been compiled with an older GTK+ library than is currently available. This will cause crashes. You need to recompile Sylpheed-Claws.

]]> By: Colin http://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-19661 Colin Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:44:15 +0000 http://www.colino.net/wordpress-1.5/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/#comment-19661 Hoa: Yes. Although GtkTreeView is slower, and it would be a huge rewrite. I'm really not eager to do that :-) Hoa: Yes. Although GtkTreeView is slower, and it would be a huge rewrite. I’m really not eager to do that :-)

]]> By: Hoa http://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-19660 Hoa Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:42:48 +0000 http://www.colino.net/wordpress-1.5/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/#comment-19660 Yeah ! you're supposed to switch to GtkTreeView/GtkTreeModel (even if it's not perfect, it has a better memory consumption). an "on-demand" model is available in etpanX if you need it since the GtkTreeStore won't help you killing the memory down. I think that calling something like g_mem_chunk_clean() was not really a solution since once a program reached a size, we can consider it's part of the footprint. Yeah ! you’re supposed to switch to GtkTreeView/GtkTreeModel (even if it’s not perfect, it has a better memory consumption).
an “on-demand” model is available in etpanX if you need it since the GtkTreeStore won’t help you killing the memory down.
I think that calling something like g_mem_chunk_clean() was not really a solution since once a program reached a size, we can consider it’s part of the footprint.

]]> By: wwp http://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-19451 wwp Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:17:37 +0000 http://www.colino.net/wordpress-1.5/archives/2006/08/25/memory-consumption/#comment-19451 Hey, you're supposed not to discover that! Now, where has the magics of memory management gone? D'oh! Hey, you’re supposed not to discover that! Now, where has the magics of memory management gone? D’oh!

]]>